As prepared by Chris Nickson, here are the practice written questions from a recent CICM Second Part exam practice session at The Alfred ICU, with recommended reading from LITFL.com Critical Care Compendium and other FOAM sources:
Q1
a) List four cardiorespiratory physiological effects post pneumonectomy. (2 marks)
b) List six potential early (<72hrs) post-operative complications specific to a pneumonectomy. (6 marks)
c) Outline your post-operative fluid management strategy after a pneumonectomy and give your rationale. (2 marks)
a) Cardiorespiratory physiological effects (2 marks)
Cardiac
- Acute rise in RV afterload from loss of ~50% pulmonary vascular bed
- Right-to-left shunt through a PFO — driven by raised RV filling pressures
- High incidence of atrial arrhythmias — atrial stretch/handling
Respiratory
- Pulmonary blood flow to remaining lung roughly doubled — raises PA/RV pressure and oedema risk
- Decreased diffusion capacity — reduced alveolar surface area
- Increased work of breathing and O2 consumption — reduced compliance of remaining lung
b) Six early complications (6 marks)
- Cardiac herniation — through pericardial defect, surgical emergency
- Post-pneumonectomy pulmonary oedema — non-cardiogenic, 4–15%, worse with fluid overload
- Atrial arrhythmias — AF/flutter, typically day 2–3
- Right-to-left shunt via PFO — due to raised right heart pressures
- Surgical haemorrhage into pneumonectomy space — may be concealed, can be fatal
- Bronchopleural stump rupture/fistula — more common right-sided, causes massive air leak
- Chlyothorax
- Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury
c) Post-operative fluid management strategy and rationale (2 marks)
- Rationale for restrictive approach
- High risk of post-pneumonectomy pulmonary oedema. Carries high mortality.
- Remaining lung takes full cardiac output. Reduced vascular reserve.
- Lymphatics and capillary integrity disrupted by surgery.
- Exception: active haemorrhage. Then prioritise resuscitation over restriction.
- High risk of post-pneumonectomy pulmonary oedema. Carries high mortality.
- Strategy
- Restrictive fluid approach. Aim for euvolaemia, not fluid loading.
- Limit total IV fluids. e.g. 15–20 mL/kg in first 24 hours.
- Accept neutral-to-negative balance.
- Treat hypotension with vasopressors. Avoid fluid boluses.
- Accept lower urine output. 0.5 mL/kg/hr is acceptable. Don’t chase urine output with fluids.
- Give blood products only for active bleeding/coagulopathy. Guide by clinical picture and point-of-care tests.
Q2
a) List the clinical features of measles, according to the phase of illness. (5 marks)
b) List 6 complications of measles that may require ICU admission. (3 marks)
c) Outline your infection control strategy for a patient admitted to the ICU with suspected or confirmed measles. (2 marks)
a) Clinical features by phase (5 marks)
Incubation (10–14 days)
- Asymptomatic; viral dissemination via lymphoreticular system
Prodrome (2–4 days before rash)
- Fever, malaise, anorexia
- 3 C’s: cough, coryza, conjunctivitis
- Koplik spots — pathognomonic white/grey buccal mucosal spots, precede rash by 1–2 days
- Period of peak infectivity
Exanthem phase
- Erythematous maculopapular rash — begins face/hairline, spreads cephalocaudally to trunk/limbs over ~3 days
- Fever typically peaks with rash onset, may be high-grade
- Rash may become confluent
Convalescence
- Rash fades in order of appearance over 5–7 days, ± fine desquamation
- Fever resolves within days of rash; cough may persist longest
- Transient post-infectious immune suppression follows, predisposing to complications for weeks
b) Six ICU-level complications (3 marks) — any six:
- Primary measles pneumonitis → ARDS
- Secondary bacterial pneumonia
- Secondary sepsis
- Acute measles encephalitis (subacute sclerosing panencephalitis is rare and unlikely to need ICU)
- Croup/laryngotracheobronchitis (and otitis media)
- Myocarditis
- Severe dehydration/ electrolyte derangement
- Haemorrhagic (“black”) measles (extensive echymoses, DIC)
- Hepatitis
c) Infection control strategy (2 marks)
- Airborne precautions immediately
- AIIR (negative pressure), door closed
- N95 (or higher) for all staff entering, regardless of immunity status
- Mask patient for any transport
- Isolation
- until 4 days post-rash onset (immunocompetent); duration of illness if immunocompromised
- Staff safety
- Only immune staff to provide care where possible
- Screen and manage exposed non-immune contacts (PEP: MMR <72h or IV IgG up to 7d )
- Only immune staff to provide care where possible
- Notify infection control/public health — notifiable disease
Q3
A 68-year-old man was admitted to your ICU following inter-hospital transfer from South-East Asia. He has multi-organ failure complicating elective cardiac surgery. He has been on broad-spectrum antibiotics for 14 days, received total parenteral nutrition, and has a central venous catheter in situ. On day 4 of his ICU admission, blood cultures flag positive for yeast identified as Candida auris.
a) Outline the mechanisms of antifungal resistance in C. auris. (3 marks)
b) Describe your immediate management priorities for this patient, including antifungal selection with rationale. (5 marks)
c) What infection control measures must be implemented and why? (2 marks)
a) Mechanisms of antifungal resistance (3 marks)
Unlike C. albicans, C. auris commonly resistant (to azoles at least)
- Azole resistance — ERG11 mutations alter the drug target (14α-demethylase); upregulated efflux pumps reduce intracellular drug levels. Majority of isolates fluconazole-resistant (MIC ≥256 mg/L in ~90%).
- Echinocandin resistance — FKS1 mutations alter glucan synthase target. Less common than azole resistance but increasing.
- Amphotericin B resistance — mutations reducing membrane ergosterol content, impairing pore formation. Less predictable/well characterised.
- Multiple mechanisms can co-exist → pan-resistant isolates reported.
b) Immediate management priorities (5 marks)
Address life threats/ manage underlying condition
- Assess ABCs – risk of respiratory failure (e.g. hypoxaemia from pneumonia), shock (e.g. cardiogenic and/or septic shock)
- Exclude ongoing cardiac surgery complications
Source control
- Remove existing CVC promptly; site new line at a different location (biofilm formation on indwelling devices reduces effective antifungal penetration)
Antifungal therapy
- Empirical echinocandin (e.g. caspofungin or anidulafungin, standard loading then maintenance dose) — first-line given reliable fluconazole resistance; do not use azoles empirically
- Send isolate to confirm identification and for formal susceptibility testing
- Escalate to liposomal amphotericin B if echinocandin resistance demonstrated or clinical failure
Further workup
- Echocardiography (TOE) to exclude endocarditis
- Ophthalmology review — screen for endophthalmitis (haematogenous seeding)
- Assess for other sources/ removable foci (prosthetic material, other lines)
Supportive care and monitoring
- Repeat blood cultures to document clearance
- Treat for a minimum of 14 days from first negative culture
- Continue supportive ICU management of multi-organ dysfunction as per standard sepsis care
c) Infection control measures (2 marks)
Unlike C. albicans, C. auris is a transmissible environmental public health emergency in the ICU setting
- Contact precautions — single-room isolation, dedicated equipment where possible
- Enhanced environmental cleaning — standard disinfectants are inadequate; sporicidal agents required due to biofilm formation and organism resistance to routine cleaning
- Notification — C. auris is a notifiable condition; report to infection control/public health
- Contact screening — skin swabs of ward contacts to detect colonisation and prevent onward transmission
You can access an extensive set of past practice questions dating back to 2014 here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_Ta8IvVaVtc5Il7-kJwj6qKGu54OmifJGRUWCXud8dY/